From: D. C. Sessions (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Fri May 04 2001 - 08:25:53 PDT
On Friday 04 May 2001 02:01, Franz Smith wrote:
> is there anyone interested to compare this 2 interfaces?
> I have to connect through a backplane 2 ASICs @2.5Gbps,
> and I'm looking for a SerDes block and high speed interfaces.
> Both can drive a coax cable or a backplane (stripeline)
> carrying data up to 2.5Gbps (3.125Gbps with 8bit/10bit coding?).
> The power consumption is reasonable, probably 20mW for the driver (?)
> using Vcc=1.8V, but SLVS could work with a lower Vcc.
> I think to use a CMOS 0.18um technology, but why not 0.12um?
> Do you see any benefit of using external 50ohm resitors?
> Vcc >= 800mV, because Voh=400mV (+)
> standard Jedec JC-16, under discussion (=)
> Vcc >= 1.8V (?), because Voh=1.5V (-)
> standard (?)
> As you see there are a lot of "?", but I haven't found
> much documentation on these to interfaces.
I'm the author of SLVS, and chair of JEDEC's JC-16 committee
which is considering it as a standard. So I'm not exactly unbiased ...
That said, I'm not sure that I'd advise using either of these for a cabled
connection. Both have quite narrow common-mode ranges and depend
on high-quality ground integrity between the driver and the receiver.
Which is Not Guaranteed in a cabled environment. For all of its faults,
LVDS really is pretty well-suited to a cabled environment.
Aside from that issue, I would (remember, I'm biased) choose SLVS for
two main reasons:
1) It has a longer future due to being (relatively) independent of the power
supply. Giving the rapidly dropping ceiling with CMOS, this is important.
2) Since SLVS is ground-referenced instead of supply-referenced, there
is no net positive bias on the connection. Which is a (minor) advantage
both in backplane and cabled connections. We're looking into hot-plug
issues for SLVS and although we don't want to promise anything it looks
good so far.
Copies of the SLVS spec _used_ to be available from my personal website,
but my (former) ISP bailed and the new one hasn't gotten the domain site up
yet. If someone wants to volunteer a site, I'll happily provide a copy for
publication; in the meantime I can mail copies on request. (I don't think
Ray would appreciate a binary bomb on the list!)
-- | The race is not always to the swift, nor the battle to the strong. | | Because the slow, feeble old codgers like me cheat. | +--------------- D. C. Sessions <email@example.com> --------------+
**** To unsubscribe from si-list or si-list-digest: send e-mail to firstname.lastname@example.org. In the BODY of message put: UNSUBSCRIBE si-list or UNSUBSCRIBE si-list-digest, for more help, put HELP. si-list archives are accessible at http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu ****
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jun 21 2001 - 10:11:50 PDT