RE: [SI-LIST] : Question on transmission line simulation by HP AD S /Momentum

About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

From: Dan Swanson (DSWANSON@BartleyRF.com)
Date: Mon Apr 30 2001 - 05:08:12 PDT


Nianci,

In Lince Calc, the basic calculation for microstrip impedance
assumes an infinetly thin strip. To account for thickness, a
corrected strip width is computed internally. The equations they
use were developed by curve fitting to a large data base of
field-solver runs.

In Momentum, the basic calculation is again for an infinitely thin
strip. If they ask you for thickness at any point ( I don't remember)
it will be a correction to the surface impedance for loss. You can
approximate thick strips by adding a ficticious air layer that is
the thickness of your strip and then add a second layer of metal
on top. Depending on the length in wavelengths, you may want
to stitch the sides together at a few points. For large, complicated
circuits this is not very efficient because you have doubled the
number of unknowns and forced the solution time to be 6 to 8 times
greater.

In the end, you are comparing two field-solvers.

Dan

Dan Swanson EMAIL: d.swanson@ieee.org
Bartley RF Systems, Inc. TEL: 978-834-4085
37 South Hunt Road FAX: 978-388-7077
Amesbury, MA 01913

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nianci Wang [SMTP:nwang@amcc.com]
> Sent: Friday, April 27, 2001 4:24 PM
> To: 'si-list@silab.eng.sun.com'
> Subject: [SI-LIST] : Question on transmission line simulation by HP
> ADS /Momentum
>
> Hi,
>
> I have a question on simulating finite metal thickness transmission line
> by
> using HP ADS Line Calc and Momentum.
>
> Basically I did simulation by using both line Calc and Momentum for
> several
> different structures, I found that Momentum always give me a higher
> characteristic impedance than that of Line Calc. The thicker the metal is,
> the
> larger the difference between two simulation results. I did talk with HP
> ADS
> help line and got the answer was that Momentum gave more accurate
> simulation
> results. I wonder if any one did the simulation by each line Calc or
> Momentum
> and compared the result with that of the measurement.
>
> Thank you
>
> Nianci
>
>
>
>
> **** To unsubscribe from si-list or si-list-digest: send e-mail to
> majordomo@silab.eng.sun.com. In the BODY of message put: UNSUBSCRIBE
> si-list or UNSUBSCRIBE si-list-digest, for more help, put HELP.
> si-list archives are accessible at http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
> ****

**** To unsubscribe from si-list or si-list-digest: send e-mail to
majordomo@silab.eng.sun.com. In the BODY of message put: UNSUBSCRIBE
si-list or UNSUBSCRIBE si-list-digest, for more help, put HELP.
si-list archives are accessible at http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
****


About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jun 21 2001 - 10:11:46 PDT