Re: [SI-LIST] : Diff clocks length matching

About this list	Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Martin.J Thompson ([email protected])
Date: Thu Apr 12 2001 - 00:21:09 PDT

Next message: [email protected]: "RE: [SI-LIST] : Diff clocks length matching"
Previous message: Steve Rogers: "[SI-LIST] : LOSS IN HIGH VSWR TX LINE (STUB Q) (CAN YOU SOLVE THIS ?)"
Maybe in reply to: AA: "[SI-LIST] : Diff clocks length matching"
Next in thread: [email protected]: "RE: [SI-LIST] : Diff clocks length matching"

After reading the discussions on this point, I just wondered (being in the UK!) if there's a chance that somewhere, possibly, mils and mm got confused... 2mm would be about 80thou (or mils if you prefer) which may make more sense.

Just a thought!

Cheers,
Martin

---------Included Message----------
(snip)
> near the clock driver. I learned that the pair needs
> to be length matched to within 2 mils.

-- Martin Thompson BEng(Hons) CEng MIEE TRW Automotive Advanced Product Development, Stratford Road, Solihull, B90 4GW. UK Tel: +44 (0)121-627-3569 mailto:[email protected]

**** To unsubscribe from si-list or si-list-digest: send e-mail to [email protected]. In the BODY of message put: UNSUBSCRIBE si-list or UNSUBSCRIBE si-list-digest, for more help, put HELP. si-list archives are accessible at http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu ****

Next message: [email protected]: "RE: [SI-LIST] : Diff clocks length matching"
Previous message: Steve Rogers: "[SI-LIST] : LOSS IN HIGH VSWR TX LINE (STUB Q) (CAN YOU SOLVE THIS ?)"
Maybe in reply to: AA: "[SI-LIST] : Diff clocks length matching"
Next in thread: [email protected]: "RE: [SI-LIST] : Diff clocks length matching"

About this list	Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jun 21 2001 - 10:11:33 PDT