Re: [SI-LIST] : Diff clocks length matching

About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

From: Ritchey Lee ([email protected])
Date: Fri Apr 13 2001 - 08:13:26 PDT


Even at 2.4 GB/Sec, we don't see a need to match closer than 60 mils. WHat
kind of application is this to need such matching?

Lee

[email protected] wrote:

> ---------Included Message----------
> (snip)
> > near the clock driver. I learned that the pair needs
> > to be length matched to within 2 mils.
>
> Damn! How fast did you say this chip ran? Must have a tremendously fast
> edge rate or something! I've never had to match to that close a
> tolerance. Wow!
>
> You might access the archives to see about some ansers. It's website
> is:
> http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu/si-list/subject.html
>
> Good searching.
>
> -M-
> _____________________________________________________________
> Tired of limited space on Yahoo and Hotmail?
> Free 100 Meg email account available at http://www.dacafe.com
>
> **** To unsubscribe from si-list or si-list-digest: send e-mail to
> [email protected]. In the BODY of message put: UNSUBSCRIBE
> si-list or UNSUBSCRIBE si-list-digest, for more help, put HELP.
> si-list archives are accessible at http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
> ****

**** To unsubscribe from si-list or si-list-digest: send e-mail to
[email protected]. In the BODY of message put: UNSUBSCRIBE
si-list or UNSUBSCRIBE si-list-digest, for more help, put HELP.
si-list archives are accessible at http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
****


About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jun 21 2001 - 10:11:34 PDT