VE7CA's

Portable
Two Element Triband
YAGI

 

As assembled and tested by John Elliott, VK5EMI, April 2002.

 

 

INDEX

 

TESTING AND ADJUSTMENT.

CONVERSION TABLE


DIAGRAM 1

DIAGRAM 2

PHOTO - feed point detail.

EXTRA NOTES

RETURN to previous  Page.

SOURCES:
Article by Markus Hansen, VE7CA, in QST magazine, November 2001.“Portable Two Element Triband Yagi”.

See the following links:

 http://www.arrl.org/tis/info/pdf/0111035.pdf

http://www2.arrl.org/files/qst-binaries/

And also:
Presented in “Amateur Radio” magazine, Australia, February 2002, by Gil Sones, VK3AUI.

 

DIAGRAMS:
DIAGRAM 1 shows the antenna with Markus’ dimensions, but with my method of connecting the three driven elements at the common feed-point.
DIAGRAM 2 shows Markus’ original feed-point design.
 

CONSTRUCTION:
I laid the antenna out on my back lawn, and  Markus suggests hanging it between two trees. Take your pick.
The end pieces of wood are about 2.45 metres (8ft 2”) long by 25mm (1”) thick dowel. This seems to be strong enough for the job.
The dowel is painted to protect the wood and to render it less conspicuous.
Black nylon marine grade cord was used throughout.

 ACCURACY OF CONSTRUCTION:
+/- 1 cm. (1/2”).

ELEMENT MATERIAL:
Markus stipulates #14 hard drawn copper wire.
I used multi-strand PVC coated wire, as I had plenty of that on hand.
I needed to shorten my wire lengths by about 1.5% from the original specifications to attain a good SWR.
This wire is flexible, and winds up easily for transport.
It will stretch with time, so better a little shorter than longer.

(NB: Markus recommends shortening the wire by no more than 0.5% to allow for the effects of the PVC insulation.
Before deviating from his recommended lengths, please read this entire article.)

SPREADERS:
6.5 mm (1/4”) black PVC garden sprinkler risers. 

STRESS RELIEF AT CENTRE INSULATOR:
I looped my wires 1.5 times around the loop-holes in the insulator.
This gives great strength, but probably compromises the tuning up of the hairpin stub.
The bared wires are all wound and soldered together, and waterproofed. 

HAIRPIN STUB:
I found the best length was 38 cms. Specification is for 43 cms.
I suggest that my difference is due to the way I applied stress relief at the common feedpoints.
In retrospect, I would recommend Markus’ method.
I used 1.7mm copper wire (16 SWG) for the parallel lengths, and double wound-wire of the same type for the shorting bar.
The parallel wires are supported by two 6.5mm PVC spreaders, and the feedline is held to one of those spreaders by a nylon tie.

 COMMON FEED-POINT:
I used the 15 metre driven elements section as the straight line.
Markus uses the 20 metre section (see diagrams).
The height above ground was about 5 metres (16 ft). This is a little low. Markus’ feed point was about 11 metres (35 ft).

WATERPROOFING:
The common feed-point was waterproofed with two coats of contact cement.
This works well – it sticks well, and is durable and flexible. 

TUNING THE ANTENNA:
Follow the original articles’ suggestions, viz.,

  1. Set the hairpin match position for best overall SWR. Start at 43 cms.
  2. Adjust the 15 metre driven and reflector elements.
  3. Adjust the 20 metre elements for best SWR.
  4. Adjust the 10 metre elements.

I hung my antenna from our elevated timber deck at one end, and over a tree branch at the other. It was easy to do length adjustments from the deck. For the centre and other end adjustments, I had to raise and lower the antenna by rope.
Height above ground is about 5 metres.

Initial tuning was done from in the shack, with 13 metres of RG213 between the rig and the RG58CU.
Final testing was done with a direct connection from the rig to the RG58, and these results are published below. Very little difference was noted between the two sets of results. 

CHOKE/BALUN FORMER:
I cut a length off a clear plastic drink bottle.
It’s very flexible, but light, strong and inconspicuous. 

FEEDLINE:
10 metres (33 ft) of RG58CU.
(Markus used 80 ft (24 metres.))

 

SUMMARY OF TESTING AND ADJUSTMENT:

 

 

INITIAL  VALUES (1)

 

FINAL  VALUES (2)

Hairpin match length

43 cms

38 cms

FREQ

Driven Element Length

Reflector Length

 

Driven Element Length

Reflector Length

 

SWR

14.0

 

4.88 m (x 2)

 

10.65 m

 

4.81 m (x 2)

 

10.49 m

1.1

14.15

1.3

14.3

1.3

21.0

 

3.35 m (x 2)

 

7.08 m

 

3.30  m (x2)

 

6.97 m

1.1

21.2

1.15

21.4

1.3

28.0

 

2.54 m (x 2)

 

5.31 m

 

2.50 m (x2)

 

5.23 m

1.2

28.5

1.6

29.0

1.7

29.3

1.8

29.7

1.5

 

  1.     The lengths in these columns are as recommended by Markus.

  2.  My final lengths correspond to a reduction of 1.5% from Markus’ original recommendations.
    Markus points out that the front-to-back ratios will be affected by changes in the lengths of the reflectors, and that 1.5% is probably too much for optimum results.
    Start at his values, and, if necessary, only reduce at 0.5% at a time.

RETURN   to   TOP 

SWR:
Values were calculated from the formula, SWR = (fwd_pwr + reflected_pwr)/(fwd_pwr - reflected_pwr).

I chose to use this method, as it gave more consistent results than using my SWR meter. 

TRANSPORT:
I found that I could easily roll up the antenna onto a 2.4 metre (8 ft) length of 80mm (3”) PVC storm-water pipe for transport.
Placing the feed-line and choke/balun into a strong plastic bag provides protection during transport.
Roll up and unroll carefully, to prevent wires and guys entangling. 

PERFORMANCE:
Markus states a gain of about 5dBd.
I have obtained good contacts with it, with quite good signal reports. 

DIRECTION:
The direction that the antenna faces can be easily reversed by flipping the array over with the feed-line. 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Thanks to Markus for his original design, and the extra information that he provided to me.

 RETURN   to   TOP 

CONVERSION TABLE

 

ORIGINAL LENGTHS

MY LENGTHS

 

10 cms

43 cms

4”

1.41 ft

 

38 cms

 

1.25 ft

A

B

C

D1, D2

E1, E2

F1, F2

10.65 m

7.08 m

5.31 m

1.88    m

3.35 m

2.54 m

34.94 ft

23.23 ft

17.42 ft

16.0 ft

11.0 ft

8.33 ft

10.49 m

6.97 m

5.23 m

4.81 m

3.30 m

2.50 m

34.42 ft

22.87 ft

17.16 ft

15.78 ft

10.83 ft

8.20 ft

J, K

L

M

N

9 cm

1.25 m

50 cms

38 cms

3.5”

4.10 ft

1.64 ft

1.25 ft

 

 

 

1.43 m

1.93 m

2.31 m

4.70 ft

6.33 ft

7.58 ft

 

 

RETURN   to   TOP 

DIAGRAM  1.

 

 

 If your browser can't display this diagram, click here.
(Wait a bit - it's a big file.)

 

 

DIAGRAM 2

 

FEED POINT  DETAIL

 

NOTE:

  1. This is before the centre insulating cords were added.

  2. I used two 50mm (2") long insulators. These are pulled tight when antenna is erected.

  3. Note the hair-pin match, with adjustable bar during testing.

  4. Choke/balun on section of former plastic bottle. (No pun intended.)

 

  RETURN   to   TOP 

RETURN to previous  Page.

 

By John Elliott
VK5EMI
Adelaide,
South Australia
May 2002.

 


   

EXTRA  NOTES FROM Markus,  VE7CA

Two Element Tri Band Portable Yagi

The following links may need to be referred to when reading this text.

http://www.arrl.org/tis/info/pdf/0111035.pdf

http://www2.arrl.org/files/qst-binaries/

"I have had a lot of response from the article and many tri-band wire Yagi's have been built to date.
 
The gain over a dipole is approx. 5.5 db.  It is very noticeable if you hang a single dipole along side the triband Yagi and do some listening.
The triband Yagi is always better, by quite a margin.  It is very similar on transmit to adding a linear.  On receive the improvement in the signal to noise ratio really helps as well.
 
Here are some further tips to help when you build it:

Assembly:
When you are ready to assemble the array, attach the 20 meter reflector and the driven elements first and then hang the array between two supports, (trees etc.) at about 5 feet above the ground.  Pull it tight so
that the array is fairly flat.  It won't want to stay horizontal because the combined driven elements are heavier than the 20 meter reflector so it is best to support one end of the 2" x 2's so that it is horizontal.  Add  the 10 and 15 meter reflectors next using a little less tension than the 20 reflector.
Next attach the feed line.   

The last step is to adjust the V slings as mentioned below so that the antenna is balanced in the  horizontal plane.
All adjustment for lowest SWR if needed should be done with the antenna raised to its typical operating position.
 
V Slings:
There are two rope V slings, one on each end.  The secret is that they are not equilateral in shape.  The combined weight of attached dipoles and feed line is heavier than the reflectors.  If the length of the sides of the V are equal, the array will want to turn with the 2"x2" end supports positioned vertical,  with the dipoles facing the ground and the reflectors facing up.  Increasing the tension on the side of the V that is attached to the end where the dipoles are also attached causes the whole  array to turn toward the horizontal plane.  Do this by shortening the length  of the side
of the V that is attached to the driven elements.  It is quite easy to adjust in the field.  Once it is adjusted, it stays balanced.
 
Once it is in the horizontal plane, you can change direction 180 degrees by giving the feed-line a pull.  If you pull it hard enough, the whole array will begin to turn-flip over.  Stop it from turning too far by holding on to the feed line once the array has swung over to face the opposite direction.
 
Balun:
It is a little unclear regarding the coil of coax at the feed point in Fig. 1.  This is meant to be a choke balun however it is best to let the coax feed line drop straight down and attach it to the centre of the hair-pin shorting bar, then make a coil of coax 6 to 8 turns with a diameter of 4 inches or so just below this point.  This balun will choke off  any RF from flowing along the outside of the coax shield.  The centre of the
shorting bar is neutral potential so no problem attaching the feed line  to it.


You don't have to use 2x2 wood spreaders, several hams have written and told me they have used bamboo poles, fiberglass poles etc.  What ever works, it only has to be strong enough that it won't buckle under the pull of the ropes at either end.
 
 
73
Markus Hansen"
ve7ca@rac.ca  

 

  

 RETURN   to   TOP  

RETURN to previous  Page.