+++++++++++++++++++ Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 20:01:57 -0700 To: k2 From: mike Subject: [Elecraft] Semi OT: ratios of unun windings Good evening, all. I'm in the process of beginning to experiment with a wanna-be Beverage, and had a question about winding an unun for it. Through the ARRL Handbook & Amidon's literature, I've calculated the number of primary & secondary turns needed for the chosen core. BTW, the antenna is for LF, receive only. I've come up with a ratio of 18:54 turns (50 ohms:500 ohms). Is it permissible to reduce this to 9:28, or even 3:9? As in, I assume the magic isn't in the exact number of turns, but rather the ratio between primary & secondary windings. Although 1:3 would be the next step, I get the feeling that this would not allow for adequate coupling between the windings. Working the formulas backwards, the 3:9 actually turns out to be a 50 ohm:450 ohm match, which is still adequate for my testing (since the impedance of the antenna at LF is only an estimation anyway, and is only for receiving). Does all this make sense? 73, Mike Boice, KW1ND Nampa, Idaho ++++++++++++++++++ From: alta Reply-To: alta at alta-research.com Organization: Alta Research To: Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Semi OT: ratios of unun windings Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 23:14:59 -0800 Mike ... It makes sense to me. And may not be too critical for LF receive-only. For HF transmitting, I know that other important factors are: the spacing between the tri-filar conductors and wire size (the resulting impedance), core material, core size, and number of turns for the 3 windings. ... Reed On Thursday 10 January 2002 19:01, you wrote: > Good evening, all. I'm in the process of beginning to experiment > -- snip -- > 73, > > Mike Boice, KW1ND > Nampa, Idaho ++++++++++++++++++++ Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 23:36:50 -0800 From: "John Grebenkemper, KI6WX" Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Semi OT: ratios of unun windings To: Elecraft Mailing List Mike; You need to compute the inductance of each winding, and from this compute the inductive reactance at your operating frequency. As a rule of thumb, the reactance should be 10 times greater than the operating impedance of that winding. If you are using it for receiving only, you can go below this somewhat, but if you go too low, the effectiveness of the UNUN will be reduced and its loss will increase. -John KI6WX > Good evening, all. I'm in the process of beginning to experiment with a > wanna-be Beverage, and had a question about winding an unun for > it. Through the ARRL Handbook & Amidon's literature, I've calculated the > number of primary & secondary turns needed for the chosen core. BTW, the > antenna is for LF, receive only. -- snip -- +++++++++++++++++