From rghigliazza@airnetworks.com.ar Mon Oct 12 01:24:59 1998 Received: from mail.cvtci.com.ar ([24.232.0.139]) by tapr.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id BAA24991 for ; Mon, 12 Oct 1998 01:24:51 -0500 (CDT) Received: from airnetworkshq ([24.232.8.228]) by mail.cvtci.com.ar (Post.Office MTA v3.1 release PO205e ID# 605-42549U5000L500S0) with SMTP id AAA301 for ; Mon, 12 Oct 1998 03:18:36 -0300 Received: by localhost with Microsoft MAPI; Sun, 12 Jul 1998 03:24:26 -0000 Message-ID: <01BDAD44.92CB2490.rghigliazza@airnetworks.com.ar> From: "Ricardo A. Ghigliazza" Reply-To: "rghigliazza@airnetworks.com.ar" To: "'ss@tapr.org'" Subject: SUBSCRIBE SS RICARDO A. GHIGLIAZZA Date: Sun, 12 Jul 1998 03:24:05 -0000 Organization: Airnetworks Inc. X-Mailer: Correo electrónico de Internet de Microsoft/MAPI - 8.0.0.4211 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From ssampson@usa-site.net Mon Oct 12 09:22:18 1998 Received: from access.usa-site.net (root@access.usa-site.net [209.140.34.130]) by tapr.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id JAA14118 for ; Mon, 12 Oct 1998 09:22:17 -0500 (CDT) Received: from dodge (dodge.usa-site.net [209.140.34.135]) by access.usa-site.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id JAA12007 for ; Mon, 12 Oct 1998 09:22:17 -0500 Message-ID: <001a01bdf5eb$49018d00$87228cd1@dodge.usa-site.net> From: "Steve Sampson" To: Subject: Re: SS on HF Date: Mon, 12 Oct 1998 09:19:12 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.2106.4 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4 I was spinning the dial this weekend, and the thought occurred to me, that SS doesn't really need the traditional "band segment" allocation. The SS band is 0 to 30 MHz on HF, but to be useful, it would need to have enough hits in each propagating segment, to perform the high bandwidth application. The question I have, is there a method in place to ask for 100 or so discrete frequencies? I know this group wasn't formed to discuss regulatory issues, but given that kind of worldwide allocation ( a WARC non-band, but discrete set of frequencies) it would give radio designers something to plan to. Since these things take years, and we haven't started yet, I would think some planning is needed, other than, we will plop down on the traditional segments, and the others will probably move plan. Steve From rlanier@harris.com Mon Oct 12 10:25:05 1998 Received: from corpmx1.ess.harris.com (corpmx1.ess.harris.com [130.41.65.49]) by tapr.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA16437 for ; Mon, 12 Oct 1998 10:25:04 -0500 (CDT) Received: by corpmx1 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.1960.3) id <4VFQ70V8>; Mon, 12 Oct 1998 11:25:01 -0400 Message-ID: <275399FB18C4D111871300805FBEB72F01215BCD@corpmx6.ess.harris.com> From: "Lanier, Robert" To: "'ss@tapr.org'" Subject: RE: 110] Re: SS on HF Date: Mon, 12 Oct 1998 11:24:59 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.1960.3) Content-Type: text/plain I know this is opening up a can of worms, but I really want to say something about this. I think we should use microwave frequencies for SS experiementing. We have frequency bands that no one is using and will probably be taken away if don't find a use for them. It shouldn't be that difficult to design equipment for GHz, but if someone wishes to knock me down on that one, I would love to hear it. I think there is too much aggrevation involved in getting SS on the HF bands. Besides, GHz frequencies are available and relatively unused. I realize there are many pros and cons with this issue (available antennae, existing equipment, etc.), but with the bandwidth needed and unused spectrum going unused, it seems only logical to go this route. What do you guys think? Tony KE4ATO -----Original Message----- From: ss@tapr.org [SMTP:ss@tapr.org] Sent: Monday, October 12, 1998 9:27 AM To: ss@tapr.org Subject: [SS:110] Re: SS on HF I was spinning the dial this weekend, and the thought occurred to me, that SS doesn't really need the traditional "band segment" allocation. The SS band is 0 to 30 MHz on HF, but to be useful, it would need to have enough hits in each propagating segment, to perform the high bandwidth application. The question I have, is there a method in place to ask for 100 or so discrete frequencies? I know this group wasn't formed to discuss regulatory issues, but given that kind of worldwide allocation ( a WARC non-band, but discrete set of frequencies) it would give radio designers something to plan to. Since these things take years, and we haven't started yet, I would think some planning is needed, other than, we will plop down on the traditional segments, and the others will probably move plan. Steve From ssampson@usa-site.net Mon Oct 12 14:15:04 1998 Received: from access.usa-site.net (root@access.usa-site.net [209.140.34.130]) by tapr.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id OAA26347 for ; Mon, 12 Oct 1998 14:15:03 -0500 (CDT) Received: from dodge (dodge.usa-site.net [209.140.34.135]) by access.usa-site.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id OAA13342 for ; Mon, 12 Oct 1998 14:15:04 -0500 Message-ID: <000a01bdf614$0dca9140$87228cd1@dodge.usa-site.net> From: "Steve Sampson" To: Subject: Re: [SS:111] RE: 110] Re: SS on HF Date: Mon, 12 Oct 1998 14:11:02 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.2106.4 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4 Thanks for the response Tony. I guess before anyone get's too excited about 1 GHz and up, is to look at the problems TAPR went through to locate a source for some of its parts. Not to say that, it probably is pretty hard to find parts for *any* project below 10k quantities... But I figure if we start planning now, we could have all the nations in line to WARC open a new band in 10 years. That way no one feels threatened. That's all I was getting at. Someway to end the ARRL membership stance against SS except on 70cm. Microwave: I finally got my Proxim Symphony ISA cards last week. These work out of the 2.4 GHz band. Sad to say that they are Win95 only, with Win98 to be announced, and anything else *not* to be announced :-) I thought maybe they might work with the RangeLan2 card on my NT box, but for some reason the darn thing pooped out (lack of use no doubt). But anyway, the product represents a breakthrough in price. Steve -----Original Message----- From: Lanier, Robert To: ss@tapr.org Date: Monday, October 12, 1998 11:31 AM Subject: [SS:111] RE: 110] Re: SS on HF >I know this is opening up a can of worms, but I really want to say something >about this. I think we should use microwave frequencies for SS experiementing. From dickrb@lsid.hp.com Mon Oct 12 15:23:43 1998 Received: from palrel1.hp.com (palrel1.hp.com [156.153.255.242]) by tapr.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id PAA28945 for ; Mon, 12 Oct 1998 15:23:42 -0500 (CDT) Received: from hplssa.lsid.hp.com (hplssa.lsid.hp.com [15.1.217.2]) by palrel1.hp.com (8.8.6/8.8.5tis) with ESMTP id NAA13523 for ; Mon, 12 Oct 1998 13:23:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lsid.hp.com (lkseast.lsid.hp.com) by hplssa.lsid.hp.com with ESMTP (1.37.109.16/15.5+IOS 3.22) id AA022253814; Mon, 12 Oct 1998 13:23:34 -0700 Message-Id: <36226546.15A1281F@lsid.hp.com> Date: Mon, 12 Oct 1998 13:23:34 -0700 From: Dick Bingham Reply-To: dickrb@lsid.hp.com Organization: Hewlett - Packard Co (Lake Stevens Division) X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.05 [en] (WinNT; I) Mime-Version: 1.0 To: ss@tapr.org Subject: Re: [SS:111] RE: 110] Re: SS on HF References: <275399FB18C4D111871300805FBEB72F01215BCD@corpmx6.ess.harris.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Tony and everyone else! This is a grand idea IF you have neighbors close-by who can receive your sigs. I am moving in a few months to a QTH that has no RF-neighbors! In fact, the only way I can experiment with SS is via HF links. At present I have no VHF (read that 2-meters and above) links to the outside world and I don't think the NPS will allow me to use their repeater-site to get out to the hams 50-miles away on 2-meters let alone install SS equipment! I have operated A DSSS system from this site over a 100-mile path on 3575KHz using about 1/4 watt of equivalent CW power to minimize QRM to the weak- signal users on 80-meters. My conclusions are that DSSS will not work for me at those low levels and FHSS is the only possible solution for me. I plan to run a simple "hopper" this winter driven by the DSSS PRN generator and evaluate the results. I will be using a (2^7 - 1) = 127-step L.O. at about 5.xxMHz so tests can also be run on 20-meters (9 +/- 5.xxMHz = 20/80 Mtrs). Everything is coherent in that all freqs are derived from stable 10MHz clocks at both ends of the link. 73 de w7wkr - Dick ======================================================== Lanier, Robert wrote: > I know this is opening up a can of worms, but I really want to say something > about this. I think we should use microwave frequencies for SS experiementing. > We have frequency bands that no one is using and will probably be taken away if > don't find a use for them. It shouldn't be that difficult to design equipment > for GHz, but if someone wishes to knock me down on that one, I would love to > hear it. I think there is too much aggrevation involved in getting SS on the HF > bands. Besides, GHz frequencies are available and relatively unused. I realize > there are many pros and cons with this issue (available antennae, existing > equipment, etc.), but with the bandwidth needed and unused spectrum going > unused, it seems only logical to go this route. > > What do you guys think? > > Tony KE4ATO > > -----Original Message----- > From: ss@tapr.org [SMTP:ss@tapr.org] > Sent: Monday, October 12, 1998 9:27 AM > To: ss@tapr.org > Subject: [SS:110] Re: SS on HF > > I was spinning the dial this weekend, and the thought occurred to me, > that SS doesn't really need the traditional "band segment" allocation. > > The SS band is 0 to 30 MHz on HF, but to be useful, it would need to > have enough hits in each propagating segment, to perform the high > bandwidth application. > > The question I have, is there a method in place to ask for 100 or so > discrete frequencies? I know this group wasn't formed to discuss > regulatory issues, but given that kind of worldwide allocation ( a WARC > non-band, but discrete set of frequencies) it would give radio > designers something to plan to. Since these things take years, and > we haven't started yet, I would think some planning is needed, other > than, we will plop down on the traditional segments, and the others > will probably move plan. > > Steve From rlanier@harris.com Mon Oct 12 15:33:53 1998 Received: from corpmx1.ess.harris.com (corpmx1.ess.harris.com [130.41.65.49]) by tapr.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id PAA29410 for ; Mon, 12 Oct 1998 15:33:53 -0500 (CDT) Received: by corpmx1 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.1960.3) id <4VFQ81ML>; Mon, 12 Oct 1998 16:33:55 -0400 Message-ID: <275399FB18C4D111871300805FBEB72F01215BD2@corpmx6.ess.harris.com> From: "Lanier, Robert" To: "'ss@tapr.org'" Subject: RE: 112] RE: 110] Re: SS on HF Date: Mon, 12 Oct 1998 16:33:50 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.1960.3) Content-Type: text/plain I don't think the availability of parts should be that difficult. I was thinking more along the lines of a transverter. I think California Microwave sells some the are in the $200 range. I could be wrong about that though. My idea was basicly to develop a "baseband" SS processor and upconvert/downconvert the signal to GHz bands. I realize this is (much) easier said than done, but with proper planning, it should be do-able. Tony -----Original Message----- From: ss@tapr.org [SMTP:ss@tapr.org] Sent: Monday, October 12, 1998 2:22 PM To: ss@tapr.org Subject: [SS:112] RE: 110] Re: SS on HF Thanks for the response Tony. I guess before anyone get's too excited about 1 GHz and up, is to look at the problems TAPR went through to locate a source for some of its parts. Not to say that, it probably is pretty hard to find parts for *any* project below 10k quantities... But I figure if we start planning now, we could have all the nations in line to WARC open a new band in 10 years. That way no one feels threatened. That's all I was getting at. Someway to end the ARRL membership stance against SS except on 70cm. Microwave: I finally got my Proxim Symphony ISA cards last week. These work out of the 2.4 GHz band. Sad to say that they are Win95 only, with Win98 to be announced, and anything else *not* to be announced :-) I thought maybe they might work with the RangeLan2 card on my NT box, but for some reason the darn thing pooped out (lack of use no doubt). But anyway, the product represents a breakthrough in price. Steve -----Original Message----- From: Lanier, Robert To: ss@tapr.org Date: Monday, October 12, 1998 11:31 AM Subject: [SS:111] RE: 110] Re: SS on HF >I know this is opening up a can of worms, but I really want to say something >about this. I think we should use microwave frequencies for SS experiementing. From hansen@fredonia.edu Mon Oct 12 15:57:42 1998 Received: from oak.ait.fredonia.edu (oak.ait.fredonia.edu [141.238.20.4]) by tapr.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id PAA00426 for ; Mon, 12 Oct 1998 15:57:40 -0500 (CDT) Received: from [141.238.20.14] by oak.ait.fredonia.edu (NTMail 3.02.13) with ESMTP id ya852902 for ; Mon, 12 Oct 1998 16:53:42 -0400 Message-Id: <3.0.3.32.19981012165733.006b3454@oak.ait.fredonia.edu> X-Sender: hansen@oak.ait.fredonia.edu X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.3 (32) Date: Mon, 12 Oct 1998 16:57:33 -0400 To: ss@tapr.org From: John Hansen Subject: Re: [SS:112] RE: 110] Re: SS on HF In-Reply-To: <000a01bdf614$0dca9140$87228cd1@dodge.usa-site.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" At 02:22 PM 10/12/98 -0500, you wrote: > >I finally got my Proxim Symphony ISA cards last week. These work >out of the 2.4 GHz band. Sad to say that they are Win95 only, with >Win98 to be announced, and anything else *not* to be announced :-) > The last time I looked at their Web page they had pricing for their ISA station adapter but did not have pricing for their access point yet. I'm wondering what you had to pay in order to put together an entire system of these components. Thanks in advance, John Hansen, W2FS From dleath@cyberport.com Mon Oct 12 16:09:32 1998 Received: from puma.cyberport.com (root@puma.cyberport.com [204.134.75.6]) by tapr.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id QAA01027 for ; Mon, 12 Oct 1998 16:09:26 -0500 (CDT) Received: from dleath (56k70-118.cyberport.com [204.134.118.70]) by puma.cyberport.com (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with SMTP id PAA15284 for ; Mon, 12 Oct 1998 15:09:19 -0600 (MDT) Message-ID: <002501bdf624$afa93740$467686cc@dleath> From: "D. Leath" To: Subject: UNSUBSCRIBE Date: Mon, 12 Oct 1998 15:10:03 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3155.0 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3155.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From murali@umr.edu Mon Oct 12 16:25:21 1998 Received: from umr.edu (hermes.cc.umr.edu [131.151.1.68]) by tapr.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id QAA01689 for ; Mon, 12 Oct 1998 16:25:20 -0500 (CDT) From: murali@umr.edu Received: from rocket.cc.umr.edu (rocket.cc.umr.edu [131.151.1.141]) via ESMTP by hermes.cc.umr.edu (8.8.7/R.4.20) id QAA25956; Mon, 12 Oct 1998 16:25:18 -0500 (CDT) Received: from (murali@localhost) by rocket.cc.umr.edu (8.8.4/M.4.00) id QAA19908; Mon, 12 Oct 1998 16:25:15 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: <199810122125.QAA19908@rocket.cc.umr.edu> Subject: UNSUBSCRIBE To: ss@tapr.org Date: Mon, 12 Oct 1998 16:25:15 -0500 (CDT) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL25] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From ssampson@usa-site.net Mon Oct 12 17:31:48 1998 Received: from access.usa-site.net (ssampson@access.usa-site.net [209.140.34.130]) by tapr.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA05958 for ; Mon, 12 Oct 1998 17:31:46 -0500 (CDT) Received: (from ssampson@localhost) by access.usa-site.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) id RAA14385 for ss@tapr.org; Mon, 12 Oct 1998 17:31:49 -0500 From: Steve Sampson Message-Id: <199810122231.RAA14385@access.usa-site.net> Subject: Re: [SS:115] RE: 110] Re: SS on HF To: ss@tapr.org Date: Mon, 12 Oct 1998 17:31:49 -0500 (CDT) In-Reply-To: <3.0.3.32.19981012165733.006b3454@oak.ait.fredonia.edu> from "John Hansen" at Oct 12, 98 04:03:36 pm Content-Type: text I payed $149 each for two ISA cards. To tell the truth I really wanted NT drivers, but thought I could get by with Win95. That is, just run the serial port over to the router. Lacking that, just keep the two networks seperate. That's what I have right now. My home system is a Ascend router to ISDN and a 10BT hub (actually it is a Co-Op ISP I've been elected to manage). I really want an AUI to Proxim, so I can get rid of the ethernet at the router (put it out in the garage) :-) I look at the Proxim access point as kind of neat, but really don't see the need. I already own a modem and the Proxim ISA cards come with software to make one the modem master, and the other computers share it. It also dials on demand when any computer requires Internet. Sorry if this is becoming an Ad, just wanted to fill in a few blanks. Best Regards, Steve > >I finally got my Proxim Symphony ISA cards last week. These work > >out of the 2.4 GHz band. Sad to say that they are Win95 only, with > >Win98 to be announced, and anything else *not* to be announced :-) > > > The last time I looked at their Web page they had pricing for their ISA > station adapter but did not have pricing for their access point yet. I'm > wondering what you had to pay in order to put together an entire system of > these components. From jeff@aerodata.net Mon Oct 12 18:05:50 1998 Received: from aerodata.net (aerodata.mich.com [198.108.18.17]) by tapr.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id SAA07425 for ; Mon, 12 Oct 1998 18:05:47 -0500 (CDT) Received: from alfalfa (alfalfa.aerodata.net [198.108.18.18]) by aerodata.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id TAA09888 for ; Mon, 12 Oct 1998 19:23:23 -0400 Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.19981012190544.03725100@aerodata.net> X-Sender: jeff@aerodata.net (Unverified) X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.5 (32) Date: Mon, 12 Oct 1998 19:05:44 -0400 To: ss@tapr.org From: Jeff King Subject: Symphony (was Re: SS on HF) In-Reply-To: <000a01bdf614$0dca9140$87228cd1@dodge.usa-site.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" At 02:22 PM 10/12/98 -0500, Steve Sampson wrote: > >Microwave: > >I finally got my Proxim Symphony ISA cards last week. These work >out of the 2.4 GHz band. Sad to say that they are Win95 only, with >Win98 to be announced, and anything else *not* to be announced :-) > >I thought maybe they might work with the RangeLan2 card on my NT >box, but for some reason the darn thing pooped out (lack of use no >doubt). But anyway, the product represents a breakthrough in price. > >Steve I was on the Linux "Proxim Rangelan" driver page the other night. (Forgot the URL, but just do a search with linux & proxim) The fellow was suggesting he thought the Symphony might work with that driver but hadn't tried it. Anyone try this yet? I seem to recall Proxim says it is compatible on the RF side with the RangeLan2's. Also, anyone see Diamond Multimedia's SS network card? Its about the same as the new Proxim as far as feature set goes. -Jeff ------------------------------------ | Jeff King Aero Data Systems | | jeff@mich.com P.O. Box 510895 | | (248)471-1787 Livonia, MI 48151 | |F(248)471-0279 United States | ------------------------------------ From drake@fiber.net.pl Tue Oct 13 18:09:39 1998 Received: from server.fiber.net.pl (server.fiber.net.pl [195.117.208.101]) by tapr.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id SAA18513 for ; Tue, 13 Oct 1998 18:09:38 -0500 (CDT) Received: from fiber.net.pl (pppa152.szczecin.tpnet.pl [194.204.141.152]) by server.fiber.net.pl (Netscape Messaging Server 3.52) with ESMTP id AAA61F for ; Wed, 14 Oct 1998 01:13:00 +0200 Message-ID: <3623EBD7.3804CEA7@fiber.net.pl> Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1998 01:09:59 +0100 From: "Pawel Kaczmarek" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.05 [en] (Win95; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ss@tapr.org Subject: Re: [SS:119] SS digest 538 References: <199810130635.BAA09937@tapr.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Remove my e-mail from the suscriber list please ! From brett@lariat.org Tue Oct 13 21:44:58 1998 Received: from lariat.lariat.org (ppp1000.lariat.org@lariat.lariat.org [206.100.185.2]) by tapr.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id VAA05189 for ; Tue, 13 Oct 1998 21:44:57 -0500 (CDT) Received: (from brett@localhost) by lariat.lariat.org (8.8.8/8.8.6) id UAA25925; Tue, 13 Oct 1998 20:44:53 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <4.1.19981013204334.00c02810@mail.lariat.org> X-Sender: brett@mail.lariat.org X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.1 Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1998 20:44:40 -0600 To: ss@tapr.org, ss@tapr.org From: Brett Glass Subject: Re: [SS:119] Symphony (was Re: SS on HF) In-Reply-To: <3.0.5.32.19981012190544.03725100@aerodata.net> References: <000a01bdf614$0dca9140$87228cd1@dodge.usa-site.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" At 06:06 PM 10/12/98 -0500, Jeff King wrote: >Also, anyone see Diamond Multimedia's SS network card? Its about the >same as the new Proxim as far as feature set goes. It may be yet another repackaging of the Harris Semiconductor DSSS PCMCIA card. The Harris card is 802.11-compliant and uses dual antennas. --Brett From smorris@mindspring.com Thu Oct 15 21:33:58 1998 Received: from camel7.mindspring.com (camel7.mindspring.com [207.69.200.57]) by tapr.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id VAA25821 for ; Thu, 15 Oct 1998 21:33:58 -0500 (CDT) Received: from win95sem (user-38lcnbs.dialup.mindspring.com [209.86.93.124]) by camel7.mindspring.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id WAA07786 for ; Thu, 15 Oct 1998 22:33:56 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <04a801bdf8ae$0f758580$7c5d56d1@win95sem> From: "Scott Morris" To: Subject: Re: [SS:90] Ethernet Bridge? Date: Thu, 15 Oct 1998 22:38:29 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.2106.4 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4 Were you able to get any help on this? I have been away for a while. I do a lot with remote computing. Let me know if you still need help. Scott smorris@mindspring.com -----Original Message----- From: Chris Brandt To: ss@tapr.org Date: Thursday, September 24, 1998 1:06 PM Subject: [SS:90] Ethernet Bridge? >Does anyone have suggestion on a cheap ethernet bridge. Or a way that I >could give another buddy access to my home network? He lives about 3 >miles as the crow flies away from me. I have a cable modem and want to >share some of my bandwidth with him through one of my available port on >my five port hub. > Chris Brandt WL7NG >