Fixed location, HT and Rubber Duck: |
||||
| Call | QSO's | Multipliers | Score | Comments |
| No Entries | ||||
Fixed location, 20 watts or less: |
||||
| Call | QSO's | Multipliers | Score | Comments |
|
K9BF
NM9H/9 KB9UJX N9BU |
36
32 23 21 |
20
21 13 13 |
720
642 299 273 |
At K9CU
At KX9X |
Fixed location, 20.1-50 watts: |
||||
| Call | QSO's | Multipliers | Score | Comments |
| K9QZI | 30 | 18 | 540 | |
Fixed location, 50.1 watts and higher: |
||||
| Call | QSO's | Multipliers | Score | Comments |
| NO9Z | 41 | 28 | 1148 | |
Mobile/Rover: |
||||
| Call | QSO's | Multipliers | Score | Comments |
|
KX9X/R
W9ADS/R |
54
45 |
45 (38 mults worked + 9 mults activated)
37 (32 mults worked + 5 mults activated) |
2538
1665 |
|
Fixed Location, Multi-operator: |
||||
| Call | QSO's | Multipliers | Score | Comments |
| No Entries |
27 total cities had activity in this contest: Bellflower, Bondville, Champaign, Crawfordsville (IN), Crescent City, Decatur, Fithian, Georgetown, Homer, Hoopeston, Hope, Lowell, Mayview, "mobile", Mole (IN), Muncie (IL), Ogden, Philo, Royal, Savoy, Sellers, Sidney, St. Joseph, Thomasboro, Urbana, Vermillion (IL), Williamsport (IN).
32 different callsigns were found in the total logs submitted: AA9X, AB9BG, K9BF, K9COS, K9CU, K9QZI, KA9DZR, KA9GWR, KA9IBS, KA9SZX, KB9LCJ, KB9NBL, KB9NDZ, KB9RMU, KB9YSE, KB9YZI, KB9ZDR, KB9ZMF, KX9X, N9BAY, N9BU, N9IJF, N9PFC, N9PFD, N9PKV, N9ZIV, NM9H/9, NO9Z, W9ADS, W9ZTH, WB9KMD, WB9Z.
Participation was down this time from the February 2001 running of the event. I hope that can be attributed to summer vacations, rather than lack of interest.
Rovers were the name of the game this time around. The re-working of the rover rules seems to have made a big difference; either that, or Andy's rover operation from the first FM Challenge inspired a lot of people to try it, too. "Rover" is probably the most challenging category to enter. Unfortunately, only two of the many rovers actually submitted their logs.
I re-worked the entry classes before this edition of the contest. Unfortunately, the two categories that people asked for the most had ZERO entries. I may look into re-defining the categories YET AGAIN if nobody will enter the categories as they now stand. I know of one person that would have taken the HT category, had they simply sent in their log. It's ALWAYS a good idea to send in your log, because you just never know what may happen.
The next running of the TCARCC 2 Meter FM Challenge will be sometime in mid to late September, 2001. Thanks to all who participated.
73,
Sean Kutzko, KX9X
kx9x@yahoo.com
Back to the TCARCC 2M FM Challenge Rules page
Back to the main K9CU page.